JMH Dull Productions - please scroll on page completely: fresh thoughts

Some folks don't have a dumb-phone because they aren't smart enough.

At some time in the future, the phenomenon known as “unconditional love” will be empirically defined and proven to exist by neuroscience.

At that time, 95% of the tenets of social behavior that we give credence to, and a large part of the way we presently look at and define ourselves socially, will be empirically proven to be a bunch of bullshit.

Everything will change.

In this entire universe there are only two types of people: good people and shitheads. These two categories supersede all our other categories, whether those categories be race, creed, national origin, political bent, gender, sexual orientation, religion, profession, etc.

This essay will attempt to shed light on this topic, the truth of which we probably all know instinctually. Our subconscious mind preaches this truth to us throughout our lives. It becomes evident when we see little children cozy up to certain individuals without parameters of prejudice or long years of life experience and taught categorization.

Shades of gray confuse the subject: all of us are neither completely good, nor are any of us complete shitheads. There is a spectrum that we can overlay on the discussion that may help us to communicate about it. We all know our saints, 10's on the spectrum. Zeroes on the spectrum have been vilified throughout history.
Definitions can serve to launch discussion toward an understanding of this, a universal matter. Here goes.

A shithead is someone who defines you through their personal agenda. They fail to see who you are as a person. A good person, on the other hand, sees you for who you truly are, with all your needs, wants and humanness. A good person's communication with you is sincere and relevant to whom you really are. A shithead's communication with you is an attempt to manipulate you into being someone that fulfills that shithead's needs and wants.
Vastly oversimplified, this definition serves the purpose of widening the discussion.

As the world gets smaller, this topic will take on more relevance. We will start to realize that in wars, debates, categories, philosophical differences, etc. we are often pitting the good against the good, protecting the shitheads of the world with mass definitions of agenda.

We will also realize that love between two good people is of a spiritual nature and that sexual communication between good people is on a different plane.
When this is understood, our sexual nature will drive us into an exploration of the topic of goodness. When we understand that a love experience between 2 good people is on a different plane than a strictly physical experience, we will all want to become truly good people: it has its earthly rewards.

This whole topic will be defined neurologically at some point in the future. The naysayers will realize that there is tangible evidence of this supposition, and this will change our world significantly.

(This essay was written by a shithead.)

The House We Live In

There’s the big house
Where those rich folks live
And I can tell you
Something about it

It’s spacious and clean
And luxury-laden
With grounds so pristine
There’s no doubt about it

They sleep in their beds
And eat at a table
In exquisite bathrooms rich-folks relieve themselves
They may or may not
Be as happy as me
Because in the end we all live
In ourselves

And what was it like to be Mother Theresa?
Gandhi or Jesus or Martin Luther King?
Who felt the same oceans
Beheld blazing sunsets
Smelled the same flowers
And heard the birds sing?

And what is it like
To live in that big house
Luxury laden with comforts galore?
I cannot lie that I’m filling with envy
Desirous of wealth, I keep craving for more

And what was it like to be Mother Theresa?
Gandhi or Jesus or Martin Luther King?
Who felt the same oceans
Beheld painted sunsets
Smelled fields of flowers
And heard the birds sing?

©2011 John Dull

dullmusic has all the might it could possibly want

consciousness understands itself
and in that moment
all is clear

fresh
-dictionary results
1. newly made or obtained: fresh footprints.
fresh - "impudent, presumptuous," 1848, U.S. slang, probably from Ger. french "insolent, cheeky," from O.H.G. freh "covetous," related to O.E. frec "greedy, bold" (see freak).
2. recently arrived; just come: “fresh from school.”
16. informal presumptuous or disrespectful; forward
3. new; not previously known, met with, etc.; novel: to uncover fresh facts; to seek fresh experiences.
4. mod. - cheeky; impudent. : Ken sure is fresh sometimes.

Eden is in the mind.
That’s why we have the concept.
Maybe that’s where we should look for it.

Fresh Thoughts

Some are short
Some are long
Statement, essay, poem or song
You may say “right!”
You may say “wrong!”
That dull is bright...
or dull’s ding dong.
Beware they'll bite
The jugular throng! –
If while you’re here
dull thoughts be gone.
*********************
on 4 pages, 93 fresh thoughts for you -
Tood-a –loo!

Warning: Some "fresh thoughts" are not unlike the movie, "Saw."
Discretion advised.

We used to think that we could spew as much poison into our water as we wanted, and nature would graciously accept it without repercussion. “When will we ever learn?”

There are still some folks that think that we can spew as much poison into the air as we want, and nature will graciously accept it without repercussion. “When will we ever learn?”

If state toll road increases cost you an additional $375 per year, and tax breaks are given that equal $175 per year, your total tax increase is $200 per year.

If a rectangular box is drawn on the ground that is designed to fit only 4 sedan-type cars in its perimeter, the only way that you could add a 5th car to the box would be to place the 5th car on top of the others. The same principle governs traffic in densely populated areas.

Anna, Sam and Barbara participate in a bigamous marriage.
They are poisoned into unconsciousness.
When they awaken; each finds them self enclosed in a soundproof room.
Anna and Barbara cannot see either of the others and are totally unaware of the state of the others. Sam can see Barbara and Ann.

Sam is given the following option and given 15 seconds to make a decision:
He has 2 levers in front of him.
One is marked "Anna", the other is marked "Barbara."
If Sam pulls the "Anna" lever, Anna and he will be released, and Barbara will die an excruciatingly painful death which Sam will witness from the booth before he is set free.
If Sam pulls the "Barbara" lever, he and Barbara will be released and Anna will die an excruciatingly painful death which Sam will witness from his booth before he is released.
Anna and Barbara will be unaware of Sam's dilemna and/or decisions and final outcome.

If Sam chooses to pull no lever, both Barbara and Anna will die excruciatingly painful deaths which he will witness. He will then be freed.

What does Sam do?

What are human rights?

What is mystical experience?

Any well-thought-out atheist would most probably agree with the following train of thought:
1. Life is a "process" as defined by all mainstream dictionaries.
2. Science tells us that an individual's life process begins when that individual's DNA footprint comes into being.
***********************
Definition of "process"
2 a (1): a natural phenomenon marked by gradual changes that lead toward a particular result (2): a continuing natural or biological activity or function b: a series of actions or operations conducing to an end;

A gynecologist developed a peculiar hate for women.
This doctor decided that whenever it was discovered that a patient was found pregnant with a female, the patient would be informed that severe birth defects were detected and immediate abortion would be recommended.
In this way, the doctor, before being apprehended, successfully eliminated 3742 female lives.
The courts decided that the females whose lives had been eliminated had no legal rights, and the doctor could not be tried for murder.
Was the doctor a man or a woman?

Space travelers came upon a mouth. They realized that this, indeed, was the mouth of the entire universe - that the entire universe was one infinite living being with a mouth. Indeed, we had discovered the very mouth of this universe! The mouth shared knowledge of its whole living universal self.
We realized that if one were to listen to the utterances coming forth from the mouth of the universe, eventually in infinite time, one would discover all the secrets of the universe.
Gradually the mouth began to protrude more and more. It took on a head, and arms and legs, eyes, nose and ears and began to move about.
We are all traveling in space every day. We are all the mouths and eyes and ears of the universe. We were already in the big boom when it happened. This is a universe at work. Cosmic dust does such things. "From dust thou art, and to dust thou shalt return."

I feel that the most influential mind in history was that of a Semite male.

PEACE of ISLAM
Peace of Islam, you will find
Focused purpose - single mind
Loving neighbor - one in kind
Conqueror of pain behind;

While there are those who undermine
The Prophets' message misaligned
In brutal ignorance defined -
Pools of blood, in darkness blind¦

As with my Christ we do the same
Smearing lies for why he came.
In hate we redefine the name
And blaming, kill in violent shame.

Mind of prophets piercing through
Their victory given - wisdom true;
Though we know not just what we do
If you will seek, they will find you¦

Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Jew
One God we all are listening to
Message pure - God gives to few
With blood this God's forgiven you.

Somehow we know
That the thinking of it
Makes it so.

Who am I to challenge you?

If you can get off your high horse and climb on to my high horse for a few minutes, continue here. And if you dare take a shot at a commoner's wisdom, please read on.

I'm just a common laborer in the trucking industry. I fancy myself as a poet-songwriter. I'm a former football player and coach. Kind of like - Joe, the plumber.

I've been trying to put together a set of questions that will help people to hone in on human rights issues from a core perspective. I must admit to you that I think that most people have it wrong. They start with a fuzzy base and build up on a screwed up core so they miss it.

If you can leave your self-righteous platform and come onto my self-righteous platform for a moment; if you have a quiet corner and a few minutes, please, let's experiment.

Please take a look at the following questions sequentially and think carefully about them.

Please read questions one by one with a thinking pause and approach them singly, first to last.

1. Are your human civil rights inherent to your individuality or are they
granted to you by an outside agency?

2. If your human rights lack an inherent quality and are solely granted to you
by an outside agency, what keeps you from being a puppet of the state?

3. If your human rights are inherent to your individuality, when does your
individuality begin?

4. Did your individual life process begin when your individual DNA footprint
came into being?

Input welcomed.